ROUGH WATERS FOR THE GREAT GREEN FLEET
Does it make sense for one of the
largest US users of petroleum-based fuels to
lead the movement away from petroleum to biofuels? This huge user - the US military -
spends billions of dollars every year on jet fuel, gasoline, diesel fuel and other
petroleum products. They spend so much that no accurate figure is available.
What is known is that in addition to the costs of the fuel itself, the costs
associated with shipping and security of fuel can add up to hundreds of dollars
per barrel. Not to mention the cost in lives. According to a study conducted by
the US military, one in eight casualties in the Iraq war was suffered by
US troops protecting fuel convoys.
These are all factors in the movement by the US Navy and other services to replace
petroleum with renewable and non-polluting biofuels. And there has been a good deal
of success. Long-term and large-scale purchase contracts with biofuel producers have
"jump-started" that industry. As a result biofuel producers have been growing and
improving their product(s) and infrastructure. Equally important they have been
reducing the price of biofuels and are closing the gap between the cost of petroleum
vs. biofuels. According to an article from the website renewableenergyworld.com
published on Friday, June 8, "The Navy purchased biofuels in October 2010 at $424
per gallon, but paid $26.67 per gallon in December 2011. Since then, a 50/50
blend of biofuel and petroleum that costs $15 per gallon has been developed..."
As of this writing biofuels were in the middle of a full-on field test during this
years' Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) Exercise in Hawaii. RIMPAC is a long-running multi-national
naval military exercise.
This years' edition will involve over 25,000 sailors
and other military personnel from 22 countries. Along with surface ships, submarines,
airplanes and helicopters. According to the US Navy/RIMPAC website "One new part of
the drills is the use of a cooking oil and algae biofuel blend to power some of the U.S.
vessels and aircraft. The Navy is spending $12 million to buy 425,000 gallons of biofuel
for the exercises." Though the industry is still very much in the research and development
phase, prices cannot drop without continued support.
With all this in mind it would almost any observer would conclude the policy and
practice of developing more biofuel capacity in the US is a good thing. We now have
renewable, non-polluting, domestically sourced, field tested fuels. Jet aircraft, heavy
tanks and other diesel equipment, and Navy ships have used these fuels successfully.
The reality is, no surprise here, that the movement toward biofuels in the US military
has extensive and powerful opposition. No surprise either, that in today's supercharged
political atmosphere the same folks who form the party of "NO" to just about everything
are leading the fight against biofuels. According to the renewableenergyworld.com
article quoted above, " Pentagon Budget Bill, H.R. 4310, which recently passed through the
Senate Armed Services Committee with a 13-12 vote and the House with a 299-120 vote,
blocks the military from purchasing and investing in biofuels if they are more expensive
than fossil fuels. The bill also exempts previous restrictions on liquid alternative fuels
derived from coal and natural gas, which emit more carbon than traditional fossil fuels."
In short, Republican politicians are holding hostage our transition to renewable, non-polluting
fuels by hamstringing an organization that has the ability, through its purchasing power,
to be a genuine "game changer."
WHAT WE CAN DO
This is a difficult issue for any individual to confront. The size and scope of the
effort to derail biofuels for the US military, and by extension the rest of industrial
America, is daunting. The good news is that there are ways for us all to magnify our
individual voices. Joining with others in organized, (and sometimes not-so-organized)
campaigns will add weight to the effort. In this case an organization called CREDO Action
is among the leaders in organizing political action in favor of biofuels. Their website
features an online petition as well excellent archives and general information on biofuel
development. For more information here is a link to a Google Search for "US Biofuels."
It is also important to remember that the movement to build the US Navy's "Great Green Fleet"
already has significant traction and is generating more support daily. With this in mind
we should remember that our vote in the upcoming election is important. We have some
clear choices. Now it is up to us to sift through the campaign rhetoric and make the
right decision.
EAGERLY EFFICIENT
EXPLORE OUR
ENVIRONMENT ARCHIVES
|
|
|